During the Vice Presidential Debate, Joe Biden made this
statement: "With regard to the assault on the Catholic Church, let me make
it absolutely clear. No religious institution—Catholic or otherwise, including
Catholic social services, Georgetown hospital, Mercy hospital, any
hospital—none has to either refer contraception, none has to pay for
contraception, none has to be a vehicle to get contraception in any insurance
policy they provide. That is a fact. That is a fact."
Well, that is not a fact. As Paul Ryan pointed out; if that statement
holds true then why are so many Catholic institutions suing the Obama Administration? That
does not seem like something that Catholics (and even some non-Catholics) would
do, if in fact they were not going to be a vehicle to get contraception. The
United States Council of Catholic Bishops disagreed with the Vice President'sstatement as well. At this very moment legal cases are being heard
based on this mandate violating the religious freedom of employers.
But before any discussion of religious freedom, it is
necessary to address a few issues. It is very important for people who are
reading about this issue to be educated. Starting
from the beginning. Since the beginning of the Catholic Church in the first
century, it has always taught against birth control and abortion. That teaching
has never changed. People may think that it has, but that is not true. HumaneVitae is an encyclical from Pope Paul IV written in 1968 which explains that
contraception is against the teaching of the Church and presents married
couples with a prayerful and natural approach to spacing children. (it is called Natural Family Planning and is not the same as the "rhythm method.")There are
plenty of resources on the internet to explain the "why" behind the
reason that the Church finds Contraception to be immoral. The easiest way to
find good sources on the subject is to Google "Theology of the Body".
But consider yourself warned, this theology is not the "sex is bad and
disgusting" Catholic stereotype that you see on TV. In fact, Pope John
Paul II said that it was the husband's duty to make sure that his wife climaxed
during sex.
A lot of people seem to think that somehow the Catholic
Church stopped teaching that contraception was immoral, and that is simply not
the case. What happened was that people within the Church started dismissing
the Church's teaching on the issue and before you knew it, picking and choosing
what doctrine you accept and don’t accept became ‘normal.’ With people being
able to select which teachings of their church they agree with, we have now come
to this point in history where we are fighting for our religious freedom. Very
few seem to understand.
what the big deal is. This is my attempt at explaining what the big deal is. It
is a big deal for everyone; regardless what you believe about birth control,
abortion or to what creed you belong to.
How does the HHS mandate violate Catholics religiousfreedom? It forces Catholic hospitals
colleges, parishes, schools and charities to pay for health insurance premiums
that cover birth control, sterilizations and abortion inducing drugs. All of these
are defined by the Catholic Church as intrinsic evils, meaning they are always
wrong. Now, it has been made to seem that only uber conservative Catholics
think this, but the fact is that even liberal progressive Catholics understand
that this mandate is a clear violation of the first amendment. The Washingtonpost has many links to some of the most progressive liberal Catholic media
outlets and they all state their dislike of this mandate. One of the collegesthat is suing the Obama Administration is Notre Dame, which took a lot of heat
from Conservative Catholics for inviting Obama to give a commencement speech.
In an attempt to appease people of faith, the Obama
Administration crafted an exemption. In order for an employer to not pay for
health plans which include things opposed to Catholic beliefs, three conditions
must be met. First, the institution must hire and serve only people of their
faith. Second, you must indoctrinate those you serve in your doctrine. Lastly,
you must qualify as a church or religious order under the IRS tax code. This
exemption is so narrow that not a single hospital, school, pregnancy help
center, soup kitchen or other charitable organization would fit into it. One
does not have to be Catholic to receive free food from the soup kitchen. One
does not have to be an Evangelical to receive assistance from the pregnancy
help center. Clearly, this exemption was created as a ruse and still fails to
protect the conscience objections of countless people of faith around the country .
When Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius was asked about how she balanced the mandate
with religious freedom, she admitted that she did not take other precedentsinto consideration.
Now, here is where things get serious. In a report by ABC news about discussions on the HHS Mandate at the White House there was an
interesting person in the room, Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards. Planned
Parenthood is the largest provider of abortions in the entire country which
begs the question what they could profit from government subsidized abortions. Many
people, including Vice President Biden, said that it was wrong to force religious
institutions to pay for something they considered to be a sin. Yet, the
President took Ms. Richard's advice and did it anyway. What people should ask
themselves is why is a president of a special interest group *that* involved in
policy making.
In keeping with the views of their founder, Planned
Parenthood has followed in the footsteps of founder Margaret Sanger in her
disdain for the Catholic Church. She was openly hostile to the Catholic Church
and what the Church teaches. You can see it in her interview with MikeWallace. Planned Parenthood has been
fighting against the Catholic Church on this issue since Margaret Sanger gave
this interview.
The problem is not access to birth control. By PlannedParenthood's own admission, they give out birth control to women who are
under/un-insured. Nobody in the Catholic Church is saying to outlaw birth
control. Do we think it is immoral? Yes. We think it is emotionally, spiritually
physically unhealthy to use. Definitely. Even non-religious people think thatthere is information about birth control that doctors do not give theirpatients. According to the World Health Organization, the birth control pill is
classified as a Class 1 Carcinogen, meaning that it is known to cause cancer.
But even with all that, Catholics are not saying to outlaw it. We want our
convictions and beliefs respected by not being forced to pay for something we
morally disagree with. Nor do we want to pay for premiums that include for birth
control, or other things that we find morally objectionable. Whether or not
some Catholics find those things morally objectionable is irrelevant. The fact
is that the Catholic Church has and always will teach that they are immoral. If
some Jews think it is acceptable to eat pork despite the fact that the Jewish
faith teaches it is against their creed to do so, does that mean the Government
can make all Jewish delis serve pork? No.
The problem here is a special interest group being involved
in making policies that violate the First Amendment in the name of Healthcare.
If it was truly about healthcare then why not cover things that will help keep
everyone healthy? What exactly does birth control cure? Why not cover chemo for
kids with cancer for free? Or blood pressure medicine, heart pills, or many of
the other medicines people need to have in order to live healthy lives? Why
birth control?
The mandate released
by the Department of Health and Human Services on January 20, 2012 is a direct
attack on religious liberty. It is about control. It is about forcing an entire
group of people to violate their conscience, their religious freedom and their
rights by coercing them to pay for abortion-causing drugs and sterilizations.
I took an interest in reading my classmate’s blog The Truth about the HHS Mandate and Everyone Should Pay Attention because I feel like the American public was introduced to Obama Care very quickly and superficially, which led to a lot of misunderstandings and inflammatory responses. I can appreciate the amount of time and effort that she put in to create a well-formed response. Not having a Catholic upbringing myself, the background information she provided about the Catholic faith really helped put their response to Obama Care in context for me. However, a link or citation would have lent strength to her comment, “in fact, Pope John Paul II said that it was the husband's duty to make sure that his wife climaxed during sex”. Since it is such a strongly worded comment, a reference might help to anchor its veracity in the commentary.
ReplyDeleteShe says, “Very few seem to understand what the big deal is. This is my attempt at explaining what the big deal is. It is a big deal for everyone; regardless what you believe about birth control, abortion or to what creed you belong to.” Working for a Catholic hospital I have seen first-hand the changes and concerns that the health care act has sparked for our institution – and how they are increasing. In some ways, I think people haven’t fully realized the impact that it will have. Although I don’t share precisely the same view on the subject as the author, her passion is clear and earnest.